This is attributed to Theodotus, a Valentinian gnostic.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/abs/epic-of-theodotus-and-the-hellenism-of-the-hasmoneans/11B988109CA30B1B502B4A67FB157588
In view of the enormous expansion of biblical studies in the last century it is highly exceptional when a book published more than a hundred years ago remains today the basic work on its subject. Such is Jakob Freudenthal’s study of the Hellenistic Jewish writers preserved by Alexander Polyhistor. Like any classic which remains influential for a long time, Freudenthal’s work has not only laid the foundations for further study but has also perpetuated a number of misconceptions. One case where Freudenthal’s opinion has distorted subsequent research is the epic poem of Theodotus, preserved in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica 9.22.1–11. Freudenthal classified Theodotus with the so-called Ps. Eupolemus, Cleodemus Malchas, and Thallus, all of whom he regarded as Samaritans and all of whom have strongly syncretistic features. This view of Theodotus has persisted in much of the literature, from Schürer down to the recent reviews by Denis, Hengel, and Wacholder. We will argue, on the contrary, that the surviving fragments present a rigidly exclusive view of Judaism and reflect the anti-Samaritan propaganda of the Hasmoneans. The combination of a distinctively Hellenistic form with a militant and exclusive Judaism provides an interesting example of the blending of Judaism and Hellenism in the period following the Maccabean revolt.
https://brill.com/view/journals/jsj/13/1-2/article-p177_11.xml?language=en
https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/theodotus-0
https://www.grafiati.com/en/literature-selections/excerpts-of-theodotus/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3642675