Origin of Lent

  1. There are a lot of various practices that evolved over the years regarding Lent. In other words, different Christian communities fasted for different periods and had different dietary restrictions. The very brief summary is that in the second and third centuries, only three- and six-day fasts are documented. In the fourth and fifth centuries, longer fasts emerged: three-, six-, seven-, and eight-week fasts.
  2. This variation in practice was summarised well by Socrates in his Ecclesiastical History: the time of keeping Easter in various places is dependent on usage, I infer from this, that those who agree in faith, differ among themselves on questions of usage. And it will not perhaps be unseasonable to notice here the diversity of customs in the churches. The fasts before Easter will be found to be differently observed among different people. Those at Rome fast three successive weeks before Easter, excepting Saturdays and Sundays. Those in Illyrica and all over Greece and Alexandria observe a fast of six weeks, which they term ‘The forty days’ fast.’ Others commencing their fast from the seventh week before Easter, and fasting three five days only, and that at intervals, yet call that time ‘The forty days’ fast.’ It is indeed surprising to me that thus differing in the number of days, they should both give it one common appellation; but some assign one reason for it, and others another, according to their several fancies. One can see also a disagreement about the manner of abstinence from food, as well as about the number of days. Some wholly abstain from things that have life: others feed on fish only of all living creatures: many together with fish, eat fowl also, saying that according to Moses, Genesis 1:20 these were likewise made out of the waters. Some abstain from eggs, and all kinds of fruits: others partake of dry bread only; still others eat not even this: while others having fasted till the ninth hour, afterwards take any sort of food without distinction. And among various nations there are other usages, for which innumerable reasons are assigned. Since however no one can produce a written command as an authority, it is evident that the apostles left each one to his own free will in the matter, to the end that each might perform what is good not by constraint or necessity.
  3. Such is the difference in the churches on the subject of fasts. (Book V. Chapter 22).

Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *