Ackrill, J. (1966), Plato on False Belief: Theaetetus 187–200, “The Monist” 50, pp. 406–418, and republished in J. Ackrill (1997), pp. 1–15.

Ackrill, J. (1970), Language and Reality in Plato’s Cratylus, in A. Alberti (ed.), Realtà e ragione, Firenze, pp. 1–22, and republished in J. Ackrill (1997), pp. 16–37.

Ackrill, J. (1997), Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford.

Acri, F. (1966) (ed.), Platone, Dialoghi, Turin.

Adam, J. (1902) (ed.), The Republic of Plato, Cambridge.

Allan, D.J. (1960), Aristotle and the Parmenides, in Düring-Owen (1960), pp. 101–115.

Allen, D.S. (2010), Why Plato Wrote, Chichester.

Allen, R.E. (1965) (ed.), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, London.

Allen, R.E. (1997), Plato’s Parmenides, New Haven – London.

Annas, J. – Rowe, Ch. (2002) (eds), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient, Center for Hellenic Studies, Cambridge (Mass.).

Annas, J. (1999), Platonic Ethics, Old and New, Ithaca – London.

Annas, J. (2002), What are Plato’s “Middle” Dialogues Of?, in Annas – Rowe (2002), pp. 1–13.

Aronadio, F. (2003), Procedure e verità in Platone (Menone, Cratilo, Repubblica), Naples.
Ausland, H.W. (1997), La “seconde navigation” dans la philosophie politique de Platon, “Revue française d’histoire des idées politiques” 5, pp. 41–56.

Balansard, A. (2001), ‘Technè’ dans les dialogues de Platon. L’empreinte de la sophistique, Sankt Augustin.

Baltzly, D.C. (2002), To an Unhypothetical First Principle in Plato’s ‘Republic’, “History of Philosophy Quarterly” 19, pp. 1–20.

Barney, R. (2001), Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus, New York – London.

Barton, D. (1999), The Theaetetus on How We Think, “Phronesis” 44, pp. 1–19.

Bastianini, G. – Sedley, D. (1995) (eds), Commentarium in Platonis Theaetetum. Corpus dei papiri filosofici, Parte 1, Commentari, Florence, pp. 1–100.

Baxter, T. (1992), The Cratylus. Plato’s Critique of Naming, Leiden – New York – Cologne.

Berti, E. (2000), Recensione a Ch. Shields, Order in Multiplicity. Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle, Oxford 1999, “Elenchos” 21, pp. 1–10.

Berti, E. (2002), Il dibattito odierno sulla cosidetta ‘Teologia’ di Aristotele, “Paradigmi” 24, pp. 1–15.

Berti. E. (2003), Continua il dibattito sulla causalità del motore immobile, in R. Cardullo – D. Iozzia (eds), ΚΑΛΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΕΤΗ, Bellezza e virtù. Studi in onore di Maria Barbanti, Catania, pp. 1–20.
Beversluis, J. (1995), A Defense of Dogmatism in the Interpretation on Plato, “Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy” 13, pp. 1–23.

Bluck, R.S. (1961), Knowledge by acquaintance in Plato’s Theaetetus, “Mind” 70, pp. 1–14.

Bonazzi, M. (2003), Accademici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone, Milan.

Bostock, D. (1988), Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford.

Boyle, A.J. (1964), Plato’s Divided Line, Essay 1: The Problem of Dianoia, “Apeiron” 1, pp. 1–18.

Bonitz, H. (1848) (ed.), Aristotelis Metaphysica, Bonn.

Brancacci, A. (1984), Oikeios logos. La filosofia del linguaggio di Antistene, Naples.

Brancacci, A. (2004), Antisthène, la troisième definition de la science et le songe de Théétète, in J.-B. Gourinat (ed.), Socrate et le Socratiques, “Études sous la direction de G. Romeyer Dherbey”, Paris, pp. 1–10.

Brancacci, A. (2005), La determinazione dell’eidos nel Menone, “Wiener Studien” 118, pp. 1–20.

Brentlinger, J.A. (1963), The Divided Line and Plato’s ‘Theory on Intermediates’, “Phronesis” 8, pp. 1–18.

Brisson, L. (1994) (ed.), Platon, Parménide, Paris.

Burkert, W. (1972), Platon oder Pythagoras, in “Hermes” 100, pp. 1–15.

Burnyeat, M. (1980), Socrates and the Jury: Paradoxes in Plato’s Distinction between Knowledge and True Belief, “The Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society”, Suppl. vol. 54, pp. 1–20.

Burnyeat, M. (1990) (ed.), The Theaetetus of Plato, Indianapolis – Cambridge.

Burnyeat, M. (1992), Utopia and Phantasy. The Praticability of Plato’s ideally just City, in J. Hopkins – A. Savile (eds), Psychoanalis Mind and Art, London.

Burnyeat, M. (2001), A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh.

Burnyeat, M. – Frede, M. (2015), The Seventh Platonic Letter, ed. by D. Scott, Cambridge.

Campbell, L. (1861) (ed.), The Theaetetus of Plato, 2nd ed., Oxford.
Cambiano, G. (1986) (ed.), Platone, Dialoghi filosofici, Turin, vol. 1.

Capra, A. (2010), Ἀγὼν λόγων. Il “Protagora” di Platone tra eristica e commedia, Milan.

Casertano, G. (2003), Il nome della cosa. Linguaggio e realtà negli ultimi dialoghi di Platone, Naples.

Casertano, G. (2012), Paradigmi della verità in Platone, Rome.

Chappell, T. (2004), Reading Plato’s Theaetetus, Sankt Augustin.
Chen, L. (1992), Acquiring Knowledge of the Ideas. A Study of Plato’s Methods in the ‘Phaedo’, the ‘Symposium’ and the Central Books of the ‘Republic’, Stuttgart.

Cherniss, H. (1944), Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, New York.

Chiaradonna, R. (2002), Sostanza, movimento, analogia. Plotino critico di Aristotele, Naples.

Chisholm, R.M. (1977), Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Cooper, N. (1970), The Importance of ΔΙΑΝΟΙΑ in Plato’s Theory of Forms, “Classical Quarterly” 20, pp. 65–75.

Cornford, F.M. (1935), Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, London.

Cornford, F.M. (1939), Plato and Parmenides, Princeton.

Crombie, I.M. (1962), An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines, 2 vols., London.

De Caro, M. (1996), Dal punto di vista dell’interprete. La filosofia di Donald Davidson, Rome.

Denniston, J.D. (1954), The Greek Particles, Oxford.

Denyer, D. (2007), Sun and Line: The Role of the Good, in G.R.F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge, pp. 284–309.

Des Places, É. (1925), Platon. Lexique (2 vols.), Paris.

Diès, A. (1926) (ed.), Platon, Œuvres Complètes. (part 2), Parménide, Paris.

Dimas, P. (2003), Recollecting Forms in the Phaedo, “Phronesis” 48, pp. 175–214.

Dixsaut, M. (1999), Le naturel philosophe. Essai sur les dialogues de Platon, Paris.

Dixsaut, M. (2005), What is it Plato Calls ‘Thinking’, in J. Cleary – G. Gurtler (eds), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 19, pp. 1–22.

Donini, P. (1994), Metafisica. Introduzione alla lettura, Rome.
Dooley, W.E. (1989), Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle Metaphysics 1, New York.

Düring, I. – Owen, G.E.L. (1960) (eds), Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-fourth Century, Göteborg.

Fattal, M. (1998), Vérité et fausseté de l’onoma et du logos dans le Cratyle de Platon, in M. Fattal (ed.), La philosophie de Platon, Paris, pp. 99–120.

Ferber, R. (1995) (ed.), Platos Idee des Guten, Sankt Augustin.

Ferber, R. (1998), Der Unwissenheit des Philosophen oder warum hat Plato die “ungeschriebene Lehre” nicht geschrieben?, Sankt Augustin.

Ferber, R. (2003), L’idea del bene è o non è trascendente?, in M. Bonazzi – F. Trabattoni (ed.), Platone e la tradizione platonica. Studi di filosofia antica, Milan, pp. 1–20.

Ferrari, F. (1987), L’infallibilita del ‘logos’: la natura del sapere noetico in Platone (a partire dalla “Linea”), “Elenchos” 8, pp. 1–19.

Ferrari, F. (2007), La transizione epistemica, in M. Erler – L. Brisson (eds), Gorgias – Meno, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, pp. 1–28.
Ferrari, F. (2011) (ed.), Platone, Teeteto, Milan.

Fine, G. (1978), Knowledge and Belief in Republic V, “Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie” 60, pp. 121–139 (reprinted with minor changes in Fine 2003, pp. 66–84).

Fine, G. (1979), Knowledge and Logos in the Theaetetus, “Philosophical Review” 39, pp. 366–397 (reprinted in Fine 2003, pp. 225–251).

Fine, G. (1984), Separation, “Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy” 3, pp. 31–87 (also in Fine 2003, pp. 252–300).

Fine, G. (1990), Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII, in S. Everson (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Ancient Thought, I. Epistemology, Cambridge, pp. 85–115 (reprinted with minor changes in Fine, 2003, pp. 85–116).

Fine, G. (1993), On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford.

Fine, G. (2003), Plato on Knowledge and Forms, Oxford.

Fine, G. (2004), Knowledge and True Belief in the Meno, “Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy” 27, pp. 41–81.

Fowley, R. (2008), Plato’s Undividable Line: Contradiction and Method in Republic 6, “Journal of the History of Philosophy” 46, pp. 1–23.

Franco Repellini, F. (2003), La linea e la caverna, in Platone. La Repubblica, vol. 5, Libri VI–VII, ed. by M. Vegetti, Naples, Bibliopolis, pp. 355–404.

Franklin, L. (2001), The Structure of Dialectic in the Meno, “Phronesis” 46, pp. 413–439.
Frede, D. (1989), The Soul’s Silent Dialogue. A Non-aporetic Reading on the Theaetetus, “Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society” 215, pp. 20–49.

Frede, M. – Patzig, G. (1988), Aristotles ‘Metaphysik ζ’, Munich.

Fronterotta, F. (1998), Guida alla lettura del Parmenide di Platone, Rome – Bari.

Fronterotta, F. (2001), ΜΕΘΕΧΙΣ. La teoria platonica delle idee e la partecipazione delle cose empiriche. Dai dialoghi giovanili al Parmenide, Pisa.

Fronterotta, F. (2005), Pregiudizi aristotelici, terzismi platonici: ermeneutica “politically correct” e ricerca storica. Risposta a Franco Trabattoni, “Méthexis” 18, pp. 29–42.

Fronterotta, F. (2007) (ed.), Platone, Sofista, Milan.

Gadamer, H.G. (1960/1990), Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen (GW, Bd. 1).

Gadamer, H.G. (1985), Platons dialektische Ethik und anderen Studien zur platonischen Philosophie, Tübingen (in GW, Bd. 5, pp. 3–157).

Gadamer, H.G. (1986/1993), Wahrheit und Methode 2. Ergänzungen, Register, Tübingen, (GW, Bd. 2) (It. transl. by Riccardo Dottori, Milan 1995).

Gadamer, H.G. (1991), Platos Denken in Utopien. Ein Vortrag vor Philologen, (GW, Bd. 7, pp. 270–289).

Gadamer, H.G. (1995), Hemeneutik im Rückblick, Tübingen (GW, Bd. 10).
Gallop, D. (1961), Justice and Holiness in Protagoras 330–331, “Phronesis” 6, pp. 86–93.

Gallop, D. (1965), Image and Reality in Plato’s Republic, “Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie”, 47, pp. 113–131.

Gerson, Ll. (2009), Ancient Epistemology, Cambridge.

Giannantoni, G. (1971), (ed.), Platone, Opere complete, Bari.

Giannantoni, G. (1990) (ed.), Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae, Naples.

Giannantoni, G. (1995), Il dialogare socratico e la genesi della dialettica platonica, in P. Di Giovanni (ed.), Platone e la dialettica, Rome – Bari 1995, pp. 3–27.

Gill, M.L. – Ryan, P. (1996), (eds), Plato’s Parmenides, Indianapolis – Cambridge.

Gonzalez, F. (1995) (ed.), The third way: new directions in platonic studies, Lanham.

Gonzalez, F. (1995 bis), Plato’s Lysis: an Enactment of Philosophical Kinship, “Ancient Philosophy” 15, pp. 69–90.

Gonzalez, F. (1998), Dialectic and Dialogue. Plato’s Practice of Philosophical Inquiry, Evanston.

Gonzalez, F. (2000), The Eleatic Stranger: His Master Voice?, in Press (2000), pp. 161–181.

Gonzalez, F. (2003), Perché non esiste una ‘teoria platonica delle idee’, in M. Bonazzi – F. Trabattoni (eds), Platone e la tradizione platonica. Studi di filosofia antica, Milan, pp. 31–67.
Griffith, T. (2000), (ed.), Plato, The Republic, Cambridge.

Hadot, P. (1974), L’harmonie des philosophies de Plotin et d’Aristote selon Porphyre dans le commentaire de Dexippe sur les catégories, in VV.AA., Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e Occidente, Rome, pp. 31–47.

Hardy, J. (2001), Platons Theorie des Wissens im “Theaitet”, Göttingen.

Heidegger, M. (1992), Sophistes, Frankfurt a. M.

Heinaman, R. (1989), Self-Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues, “Phronesis” 34, pp. 56–79.

Heitsch, E. (1988), Überlegungen Platons im Theaetet, Mainz.

Hemmenway, S.R. (1996) Sophistry Exposed: Socrates on the Unity of Virtue in the Protagoras, “Ancient Philosophy” 16, pp. 1–23.

Hicken, W.F. (1954) Phaedo 93a11–94b3, “Classical Quarterly” n.s. 4, pp. 16–22.

Hyland, D. (1995), Finitude and Transcendence in the Platonic Dialogues, Albany.

Ioppolo, A.M. (1999), Introduzione a Platone, Teeteto, Rome – Bari.

Isnardi Parente, M. (1970), Filosofia e Politica nelle Lettere di Platone, Naples.

Isnardi Parente, M. (1996), Il pensiero politico di Platone, Rome – Bari.

Kahn, Ch. (1973), Language and Ontology in the Cratylus, in E.N. Lee – P.D. Mourelatos – R.M. Rorty (eds), Exegesis and Argument. Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, Assen, pp. 152–176.

Kahn, Ch. (1986), Les mots et les formes dans le “Cratyle” de Platon, in VV.AA., Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité, Grenoble, pp. 91–103.
Karasmanis, V. (1988), Plato’s Republic: the Line and the Cave, “Apeiron” 21, pp. 147–171.

Keller, S. (2000), An Interpretation of Plato’s Cratylus, “Phronesis” 45, pp. 284–305.

Kelsey, S. (2000), Recollection in the Phaedo in J. Cleary – G.M. Gurtler (eds), “Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy” 16, pp. 91–121.

Krämer, H.J. (1997), Die Idee des Guten. Sonnen- und Liniengleichnis, in Platon. Politeia, ed. by O. Höffe, Berlin, pp. 179–203.

Lafrance, Y. (1981), La doctrine platonicienne de la doxa, Paris.

Lafrance, Y. (1987), Pour interpréter Platon. La ligne en République VI, 509d–511e. Bilan analytique des études (1804–1984), Montréal – Paris.

Lafrance, Y. (1994), La ligne en République VI, 509d–511e: le texte et son histoire, Montréal – Paris.

Le Moli, A. (2002), Heidegger e Platone. Essere, relazione, differenza, Milan.

Lesher, J.H. (1969), Gnosis and Epistêmê in Socrates’ Dream in the Theaetetus, “Journal of Hellenic Studies” 89, pp. 72–78.

Linguiti, A. (1990), L’ultimo platonismo greco. Principi e conoscenza, Florence.

Longo, A. (2000), La tecnica della domanda e le interrogazioni fittizie in Platone, Pisa.

Mansion, S. (1969), Mathématiques et dialectique selon Platon, “La Revue Philosophique de Louvain” 57, pp. 365–388.
Manuwald, B. (1999) (ed.), Platon, Protagoras, Göttingen 1999.

Martinelli Tempesta, S. (2000), Alcune considerazioni su Platone, “Menone”, 98a3, in: “Acme”, 53, pp. 3–18.

Martinelli Tempesta, S. (2003), Sul significato di δεύτερος πλοῦς nel Fedone di Platone, in M. Bonazzi – F. Trabattoni (eds), Platone e la tradizione platonica. Studi di filosofia antica, Milan, pp. 89–125.

McDowell, J. (1973), Plato: Theaetetus, Oxford.

McKirahan, R.D. (1985), Socrates and Protagoras on Holiness and Justice (Protagoras 330c–332a), “Phoenix” 39, pp. 342–354.

Meinwald, C. (1991), Plato’s Parmenides, Oxford.

Meinwald, C. (1992), Good-bye to the Third Man, in R. Kraut (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge, pp. 365–396.

Migliori, M. (1990), Dialettica e Verità. Commentario filosofico al Parmenide di Platone, Milan.

Migliori, M. (1994) (ed.), Platone, Parmenide, Milan.

Miller, M.H. (1986), Plato’s Parmenides, Princeton.

Miller, M. (1992), Unity and Logos: A Reading of Theaetetus 201c–210a, “Ancient Philosophy” 12, pp. 87–111.

Mohr, R. (1984), The Divided Line and the Doctrine of Recollection in Plato, “Apeiron” 718, pp. 34–41.

Musti, D. (1992), Storia Greca, Rome – Bari.

Narcy, M. (1994) (ed.), Platon, Thééthète, Paris.

Narcy, M. (2002), Doxazein: “opinare” o “giudicare”, in G. Casertano (ed.), Il Teeteto di Platone: strutture e problematiche, pp. 7–23, Naples.

Nehamas, A. (1979), Self-Predication and Plato’s Theory of Forms, “American Philosophical Quarterly” 16, pp. 93–103.

Netz, R. (2003), How Propositions Begin. Towards an Interpretation of ὑπόθεσις in Plato’s Divided Line, “Hyperboreus” 9, pp. 295–317.

Nussbaum, M. (1986), The Fragility of Goodness, Cambridge.

Penner, T. (1973), The Unity of Virtue, “Philosophical Review” 82, pp. 35–68.

Penner, T. (1987), The Ascent from Nominalism, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, Tokyo.

Polansky, R. (1992), Philosophy and Knowledge. A Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus, London – Toronto.

Press, G. (2000) (ed.), Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity, Lanham.

Quarch, C. (1998), Sein und Seele. Platon Ideen-philosophie als Metaphysik der Lebendigkeit. Interpretationen zu ‘Phaidon’ und ‘Politeia’, Münster.

Quine, W.V. (1953), From a Logical Point of View. Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, Harvard.

Rappe, S. (2000), Reading Neoplatonism. Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus and Damascius, Cambridge.

Reale, G. (1993) (ed.), Aristotele, Metafisica, vol. 3, Milan.
Renaud, F. (1999), Die Resokratisierung Platons. Die platonische Hermeneutik Hans Georg Gadamers, Sankt Augustin.

Reshotko, N. (2001), Virtue as the only unconditional – but non intrinsic – Good: Plato’s Euthydemus 278e3–281e5, “Ancient Philosophy” 21, pp. 325–334.

Robinson, R. (1950), Forms and Error in Plato’s Theaetetus, “Philosophical Review” 59, pp. 3–30, reprinted in Id., Essays in Greek Philosophy, Oxford 1969, pp. 39–73.

Robinson, R. (1956), Criticism of Plato’s Cratylus, “The Philosophical Review” 65, pp. 324–341 (reprinted in Essays in Greek Philosophy, Oxford 1969, pp. 100–117).

Rosen, S. (1983), Plato’s Sophist. The drama of original and image, Yale.

Rosen, S. (1993), The question of Being. A reversal of Heidegger, Yale.

Rosen, S. (2005), Plato’s ‘Republic’. A Study, New Haven – London.

Rosenmeyer, Th. (1998), Name-Setting and Name-Using: Elements of Socratic Foundationalism in Plato’s Cratylus, “Ancient Philosophy” 18, pp. 41–60.

Ross, D. (1924) (ed.), Aristotle, Metaphysics, vol. I, Oxford.
Rowe, Ch. (2002), Socrates and Plato on virtue and the good: an analytical approach, in G. Reale – S. Scolnicov (eds), New Images of Plato. Dialogues on the Idea of the Good, Sankt Augustin, pp. 253–264.

Rowe, Ch. (2007), Plato and the art of philosophical writing, Cambridge.

Runciman, W.G. (1962), Plato’s Later Epistemology, Cambridge.

Ryle, G. (1939), Plato’s Parmenides, “Mind” 48, pp. 129–151 and 301–325 (repr. in R.E. Allen (ed.) Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, London – New York 1965, pp. 97–147).

Ryle, G. (1965), Letters and Syllables in Plato, “Philosophical Review” 69, pp. 431–451.

Ryle, G. (1990), Logical Atomism in Plato’s Theaetetus, “Phronesis” 35, pp. 21–46.

Sallis, J. (1996), Being and Logos. Reading the Platonic Dialogues, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Santas, G. (1979), Socrates. Philosophy in Plato’s Earlier Dialogues, London – Boston – Melbourne – Henley.

Savan, D. (1964), Self-Predication in Protagoras 330–331, “Phronesis” 9, pp. 130–135.

Sayre, K. (1983), Plato’s Late Ontology. A Riddle Resolved, Princeton.

Sayre, K. (1993), Why Plato Never Had a Theory of Forms, “Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy” 9, pp. 167–199.

Sayre, K. (1994), Parmenides’ Lesson, Notre Dame.

Sayre, K. (1995), Plato’s Literary Garden: How to Read a Platonic Dialogue, Notre Dame – London.

Schiappa, E. (2003), Protagoras and Logos, South Carolina.

Scolnicov, S. (2003) (ed.), Plato’s Parmenides, California.

Scott, D. (2006) (ed.), Plato’s Meno, Cambridge.
Scott, G.A. – Welton, W.A. (2000), Eros as Messenger in Diotima’s Teaching, in Press (2000) pp. 147–159.

Sedley, D. (1996), Three Ancient Interpretation of the Theaetetus, in Ch. Gill – M. McCabe (eds), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford, pp. 79–104.

Sedley, D. (2003), Plato’s Cratylus, Cambridge.

Sedley, D. (2004), The Midwife of Platonism. Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford.

Seeck, G.A. (1997), Nicht-Denkfehler und natürliche Sprache bei Platon, “Zetemata” 96, Munich.

Shipton, K. (1979), A Good Second-Best: Phaedo 99b ff., “Phronesis” 24, pp. 33–53.

Shorey, P. (1903), The Unity of Plato’s Thought, Chicago.

Silverman, A. (1990), Self-Predication and Synonymy, “Ancient Philosophy” 10, pp. 193–202.

Silverman, A. (2001), The End of the Cratylus: Limning The World, “Ancient Philosophy” 21, pp. 25–43.
Silverman, A. (2002), Plato’s Cratylus: the Naming of Nature and the Nature of Naming, in “Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy” 10, pp. 25–71.

Silverman, A. (2002 bis), The Dialectic of Essence. A Study of Plato’s Metaphysics, Princeton.

Slings, S.R. (2001) (ed.), Platonis Rempublicam, Oxford.

Smith, N. (1981), The Objects of διάνοια in Plato’s Divided Line, “Apeiron” 15, pp. 129–137.

Smith, N. (2000), Plato on Knowledge as a Power, in “Journal of the History of Philosophy”, 38, pp. 145–168.

Smith, N.D. (1996), Plato’s Divided Line, “Ancient Philosophy” 16, pp. 25–46.

Sorabji, R. (1982), Myths about Non-Propositional Thought, in M. Schofield – M. Nussbaum (ed.), Language and Logos. Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy presented to G.E.L. Owen, Cambridge 1982.

Stemmer, P. (1992), Platons Dialektik. Die frühen und mittleren Dialoge, Berlin – New York.

Stern, P. (2008), Knowledge and Politics in Plato’s Theaetetus, Cambridge.

Szlezák, T.A. (2002), Die Idee des Guten als arche in Platon Politeia, in G. Reale – S. Scolnicov (eds), New Images of Plato. Dialogues on the Idea of the Good, Sankt Augustin, pp. 49–68.

Taylor, C.C.W. (1991) (ed.), Plato. Protagoras, revised edition, Oxford.

Tejera, V. – Hart, R.E. (1997) (eds), Plato’s dialogues: the Dialogical Approach, Lewiston.

Trabattoni, F. (1985), Sul significato dello ‘Ione’ platonico, “Sandalion” 8–9, pp. 27–57.
Trabattoni, F. (1993), Review to G. Vlastos, Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge 1991, “Rivista di storia della filosofia” 48, pp. 179–184.

Trabattoni, F. (1994), Scrivere nell’anima. Verità, dialettica e persuasione in Platone, Florence.

Trabattoni, F. (1996), Alcune considerazioni generali sul Socrate di Platone, “Rivista di Storia della Filosofia” 51, pp. 895–906.

Trabattoni, F. (1998), Platone, Rome.

Trabattoni, F. (1998 bis), Parmenide, Ι, 31–32, “Hyperboreus. Studia classica” 4, pp. 5–20.

Trabattoni, F. (2000) (a cura di), Gorgia-Platone. Parola e Ragione, Milan.

Trabattoni, F. (2000 bis), Quale Platone? Risposta a Mario Vegetti, “Elenchos” 21, pp. 99–105.

Trabattoni, F. (2000 ter), Sull’etica di Platone: in margine a un nuovo commento alla Repubblica, “Rivista di Storia della filosofia” 55, pp. 607–618.

Trabattoni, F. (2001), L’argomentazione platonica, “Προβλήματα” 1, pp. 7–28.

Trabattoni, F. (2001 bis), Persuasione e scrittura nelle Leggi platoniche, “Rivista di Storia della filosofia” 56, pp. 357–371.

Trabattoni, F. (2002), L’orientamento al bene nella filosofia di Platone, in G. Reale – S. Scolnicov (eds), New Images of Plato. Dialogues on the Idea of the Good, Sankt Augustin, pp. 294–304.

Trabattoni, F. (2003), Aristotele. Etica Eudemia α 8, “Elenchos” 24, pp. 279–309.

Trabattoni, F. (2003 bis), Il dialogo come portavoce dell’opinione di Platone. Il caso del Parmenide, in M. Bonazzi – F. Trabattoni (eds), Platone e la tradizione platonica. Studi di filosofia antica, Milan, pp. 151–178.

Trabattoni, F. (2003 ter), Filosofia e dialettica in Damascio, in M. Barbanti – G. Giardina – P. Manganaro (eds), ΕΝΩΣΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΦΙΛΙΑ. Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano, Catania, pp. 477–494.
Trabattoni, F. (2004), Il Liside: un’introduzione all’etica platonica, in Platone, Liside, ed. by F. Trabattoni. Vol. 2, Milan, pp. 47–171.

Trabattoni, F. (2004 bis), Jacques Derrida e le origini greche del logocentrismo (Platone, Aristotele), “Iride. Filosofia e discussione pubblica”, 17 (2004), pp. 547–568.

Trabattoni, F. (2004 ter), Recensione a L.J. Jost – R.A. Shiner (eds), Eudaimonia and Well-Being. Ancient and Modern Conceptions, “Apeiron”, 35 (2002), in “Elenchos” 25, pp. 159–168.

Trabattoni, F. (2005), La verità nascosta. Oralità e scrittura in Platone e nella Grecia classica, Rome.

Trabattoni, F. (2006), L’intuizione intellettuale in Platone. In margine ad alcune recenti pubblicazioni, “Rivista di Storia della filosofia” 61, pp. 701–719.

Trabattoni, F. (2008), Socrate, Antistene e Platone sull’uso dei piaceri, in L. Rossetti – A. Stavru (eds) Socratica 2005, Studi sulla letteratura socratica antica, Bari, pp. 235–261.

Trabattoni, F. (2008 bis), Interpretare Platone con mano “leggera”, “Elenchos” 39, pp. 130–137.

Trabattoni, F. (2008 ter), Platone, Martha Nussbaum, e le passioni, in G.R. Giardina (ed.), Le emozioni secondo i filosofi antichi, Catania, pp. 39–61 (also published in Trabattoni 2009 bis, pp. 199–216).

Trabattoni, F. (2009), Platone, Rome.

Trabattoni, F. (2009 bis), Attualità di Platone. Studi sui rapporti tra Platone e Rorty, Heidegger, Gadamer, Derrida, Cassirer, Strauss, Nussbaum e Paci, Milano.

Trabattoni, F. (2009 ter), Aristotele, la teoria delle idee e gli “argomenti più rigorosi”, in R.L. Cardullo (ed.), Il libro Alpha della Metafisica di Aristotele tra storiografia e teoria, Catania, pp. 96–113.

Trabattoni, F. (2010), Is the platonic ideal of the kallipolis still of topical interest?, in F. Lisi – G. Cornelli (eds), Plato and the City, Sankt Augustin, pp. 34–45.

Trabattoni, F. (2011), Platone, Fedone, Turin.
Trabattoni, F. (2012), Cause formali e cause finali nel Fedone, in L. Palumbo (ed.), λόγον διδόναι. La filosofia come esercizio del render ragione. Studi in onore di Giovanni Casertano, Naples, pp. 435–449.

Trabattoni, F. (2013), Come leggere i dialoghi di Platone? L’inefficacia del metodo evolutivo, in A. Balansard – I. Koch (eds), Lire les dialogues. Mais lequels et dans quel ordre? Sankt Augustin, pp. 253–268.

Trabattoni, F. (2013 bis), Le néoplatonisme de Plotin, on l’invention d’une science métaphysique platonicienne, “Φιλοσοφία” 43, pp. 273–288.

Trabattoni, F. (2013 ter), Wittgenstein, Plato and the ‘craving for generality’, in L. Perissinotto – Begoña Ramón Cámara (eds), Wittgenstein and Plato. Connections, comparisons and Contrasts, London – New York, pp. 220–248.

Trabattoni, F. (2014), Fedone 65a–68c: possibilità e limiti della filosofia, in R. Cardullo – D. Iozzia (eds), ΚΑΛΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΕΤΗ, Bellezza e virtù. Studi in onore di Maria Barbanti, Catania.

Trabattoni, F. (2014 bis), Socrate conteso. Platone e gli Stoici, in F. De Luise – A. Stavru (eds), Socratica III, Studies on Socrates, the Socratics, and the Ancient Socratic Literature, Sankt Augustin, pp. 106–118.
Vegetti, M. (1993), L’idea del bene nella ‘Repubblica’ di Platone, “Discipline filosofiche” 1, pp. 207–229.

Vegetti, M. (1993 bis), Κενολογεῖν in Aristotele, in A.M. Battegazzore (ed.), Dimostrazione, argomentazione dialettica e argomentazione retorica nel pensiero antico, Genoa, pp. 37–60.

Vegetti, M. (2000), Introduzione a M. Vegetti (ed.), Platone, Repubblica, Libro 5, Naples, pp. 13–38.

Vegetti, M. (2000 bis), ‘Beltista eiper dynata’. Lo statuto dell’utopia nella ‘Repubblica’, in M. Vegetti (ed.), Platone, Repubblica, Libro 5, Naples, pp. 107–147.

Vegetti, M. (2003), Quindici lezioni su Platone, Turin.

Vegetti, M. (2007) (ed.), Platone, La Repubblica, Milan.

Vegetti, M. (2015), Chorismos, in L. Candiotto (ed.), Senza dualismo. Nuovi percorsi nella filosofia di Platone, Milan 2015, pp. 27–34.

Vlastos, G. (1972), The Unity of the Virtues in the Protagoras, “Review of Metaphysics” 25, pp. 415–458 (later republished in Platonic Studies, Princeton 1973, pp. 221–265).

Vlastos, G. (1974), A Note on ‘Pauline Predication’ in Plato, “Phronesis” 19, pp. 95–101.

Vlastos, G. (1981), On a Proposed Redefinition of “Self-predication” in Plato, “Phronesis” 26, pp. 76–79.

Vlastos, G. (1991), Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wachterhauser, B. (1999), Beyond Being. Gadamer’s Post-Platonic Hermeneutical Ontology, Evanston.

Wakefield, J. (1987), Why Justice and Holiness are Similar: Protagoras 330–331, “Phronesis” 32, pp. 267–276.

Watson, W. (1995), Dogma, Skepticism, and Dialogue, in F. Gonzalez (ed.), The Third Way. New Directions in Platonic Studies, Boston, pp. 189–210.

White, F.C. (1972), Ὡς ἐπιστήμη οὖσα: A Passage of Some Elegance in the ‘Theaetetus’, “Phronesis” 17, pp. 219–226.

White, N.P. (1976), Plato on Knowledge and Reality, Indianapolis.

White, N.P. (1996), Plato’s Divided Line, “Ancient Philosophy” 16, pp. 25–46.

Wieland, W. (1982), Plato und die Formen des Wissens, Göttingen.